is now already gone by the third quarter - although it was mixed with sunshine, we are dissatisfied with the non-profit.

quick, inexpensive and easily on the Internet. The company Klarmobil promises in their advertisements on the web. But that not everything is clear with clear cell is to make this experience Mr. Manuel H. had some time ago. Therefore, he turned for help to our editorial staff.
The case: Mr H.
closing at Klarmobil a so-called Internet Flat contract down, gave the Surf-Stick it for 29.95 and a monthly flat fee of 9.95 € Surf. The surf stick is delivered promt, in the accompanying letter it was said then:
PIN and PUK for activation the card will be sent in a separate letter.
This happened also. But - Mr. H. had not activated the card , that is, he ran the stick along with unactivated card in the corner is, he wanted to use it only for the holidays, to quickly access the Internet. The bad surprise came
few weeks later, as the company requires Klarmobil suddenly Surf fees for the current month and proportionately for the previous month. Whopping € 53.06. Our reader then brought a complaint by email, go back and let the direct debit. The so-called supernatural expensive customer hotline on a 0900 number did not use customer H.. Moreover, the clear mobile card was locked a few weeks ago, when the customer back to read the direct debit. Moreover
H. customer the cost of the so-called Surfstick amount of 29.95 euros would be paid, but of course not the Internet costs, which he had never made.
The receipt: From Klarmobil a new bill for € 73.01, which will € 19.95 chargeback fee be included. A correct answer to his many emails to clarify the situation was not a client of H. Klarmobil.
But the story does not end there. Suddenly Mr. H. flutters a "new account" on 19.90 € of clear cell into the house, per month for a phone card . Conscious calculation is not sent as email attachments, but you should log into a so-called "customer menu" with a password and a number. The customer does H. obviously, to not in this way may enable the stick.
A look to the Internet, the Google search brought us there's little flattering about the company Klarmobil . Therefore, we turned to the company Klarmobil , and asked them by means of a fax to comment on the facts. Results: No answer!
The Euroweb GmbH is a solid company, which a rogue act was not hold.
From the perspective of the court in this case is suspected of a crime of a process involved, namely the witness ... [NB .: Staff of the Euroweb], possibly also other employees of the plaintiff [Note: Euroweb]. The witness could ... the defendant have been mistaken about the content of the contract offered and shall cause to contract, which can be done in addition to the blank signature contrary to the agreement items in the contract form. Herein could be a fraud under § 263 StGB. This follows from the statement by the defendant, the clear parallels with the talk in the parallel method has. The defendants have denied the two methods is not apparent. There are also mandated different lawyers.
There Inkasobüros which are very publicity-shy when it comes to questions from the media and a camera team. This shows a video of the Act by visiting the team of the Act, the company acoreus Collection Services GmbH want, and want to ask some tough questions about their Mahnmethoden and their legality.
Man denied information, obtained the police, can the team acts out of the house, throw and shows The reporter then acts on several counts of trespassing on. Then the team uses the "Association of German debt collection company, what it hears there is little flattering to acoreus collection.
acoreus collection has now turned to a law firm in Munich, which video hosting platforms such as how. Dailymotion anschreibt, and encourages delete unpopular reports. (Reason: violation of personal rights of acoreus collection GmbH and false assertions of fact). As the company acoreus collection attempts to prevent honest reporting, the report also shows of another website operator.
Addendum: Today, on 07/09/2010 was the video "if the reporter 2 x rings " at YouTube deleted
at the firm or Mr. Romatka Skrabal, they should be ashamed of flimsy justifications delete one to let facts at danger video. We would be interested so, what the "arguments" they got deleted this video. But for the editors of consumer is not a problem, here it is again set new .
Certain Satellite T130 and T130 Satellite Pro notebooks a potentially defective power jack was installed. Under certain circumstances, such a faulty power socket heat so far that the underside of the device to melt the connector. Due to the high temperatures cause burns if overheated power jack or the AC plug to be touched in certain places.
Whether you are affected may be able to check using the first six digits of the model number . This number can be found on the product label on the back. If the model number with PST3AE or PST3BE begins, the device may is affected.
This information applies only to those with laptops, which were placed in the EMEA region by Toshiba Europe GmbH on the market.
Toshiba strongly recommends that the system BIOS soon as possible to version 2.70 or update later
Source: toshiba.eu
We reported recently on the fourth May 2010 on the collection agency that attempts to partially fund stale claims to make. Then ... silence. On 09/02/2010 we reached a fax in the complained of legal representatives of acoreus that we allegedly infringe the personal rights of his client, if we the warning letter, the "I" have received publish.
Has a debt collection company a personality? One wonders how that can equal it. And how these rights through the publication of a Letter, which is not private, but questionable content may be hurt even more.
One striking still, the rather brazenly appearing here by warning the "Star-lawyers" is a cease and desist declaration. This is a payment of € 10.ooo are promised - and for any case of violation. And of course, would acoreus Collection Services GmbH, a compensation, which is calculated from a subject value of € 15.ooo . (. ... ...)
personal rights : this was mentioned ...
Who been active in the economy is, to a considerable amount of criticism of his performance from (cf. BGH, Judgement of 10 November 1994 - I ZR 216/92 - AFP 1995, 404, 407 f. - dubious business practices - and BGHZ 138 , 311, 320 with further references). To such criticism include the attribution. The public has to proceed in such cases, a legitimate interest in who it is and the press could not meet through an anonymous reporting their opinion-making duties. In that regard, expresses the social restrictions of the individual in his personal privacy restrictions. Because this may not lead to Areas of community life from public criticism and communication solely shut out because it got people involved against their will into the public domain (see BGH 20 January 1981 - VI ZR 163/79)
As already mentioned, we find remarkable that a machine can feel violated their personal rights.
(all letters we receive have included the line: This letter is valid produced electronically without signature).
A curious and very instructive the approach of another blog operator, which is also in Collection acoreus reported.
verbraucherinfoTV Hello,
Some or all elements of your video: "The meshes of the company Euroweb," have been recognized as a violation of the copyrights of a third party (eg author, producer, artist, etc.). It was removed on request from the copyright holder.
You should make sure that the use and dissemination of copyrighted content, the permission of the author or owner requires. If you like the distribution of the video is permitted, please send us details via email to feedback@dailymotion.com.Very interesting all soso, we hurt when production our copyrights, well, something also ....