Thursday, January 17, 2008

Vans Shoes Blog Post A Comment

biogas Fireball: awesome power of fermentation

biogas fireball in Riedlingen: awesome power of fermentation


The cows on the Swabian Alb are peaceful. Early on Sunday morning of 16 December 2007, they were in their warm houses, dreaming of green pastures innocent. Meanwhile, their gardens in feces collected Riedlingen-Daugendorf in about 22 m high and 17 m thick large tank of the biogas plant, called fermenters. The system has cost about € 3 million.

was at 4 clock in the morning spotted a fire on the tank ball. The screw-enamel steel plates were torn down and 4,100 cubic meters of diluted manure poured tsunami-like of all that stood in the way. Weighing a ton machine part was washed away 50 m wide. Heavy construction equipment were damaged.

Fortunately no persons were present. Otherwise they would have gotten more than a few splashes. 4.18 to clock the fire department was alerted Riedlingen. Before long they arrived with other brigades and emergency services, and examined with gas detection equipment, the brown mass that probably could go out of their even more evil. Quickly build a light tower was erected. After daybreak, a police helicopter circled and photographed the wreckage and the manure lagoon. He reached up to 200 m far from the plant site. With the-art laser equipment was surveyed the crash site. The number of forces is said to have stood at just under one hundredth

The course of the wreck is in the media, based to witness and expert testimony, described in part contradictory. Accordingly, on Thursday last gas measurements were made, the results "were fine g. This implies that the tank was filled and the fermentation was already running. Measurements were made of 52% methane and about 0.5% oxygen in the biogas, a mixture that is not explosive. On Friday, the plant was officially in the test run. Apparently there was no more check the gas composition, although the fermentation was already more than a day. On Saturday, an electrician and a mechanic who worked on the system and your settings. To 19 clock they then leave with one of the 13 farmers, the plant operator. Also here is nothing known by another gas measurement. The plant should be running at the time of the accident is fully automatic. The next gas measurement was then mentioned on Sunday morning by the fire in the open instead.

In expert circles, it means that may be the start of a fermenter, a critical stage. We ask ourselves: Why did the technician, the gas composition in this phase is no longer measured? them about the sampling was too dangerous?

The experts were hurrying after the accident at first a press conference. Anton "Toni g Rupert Baumann Wangen im Allgäu stresses that there can be no explosion in a fermenter, but at a deflagration, the slower go. He is a member of the cooperative biogas advice "fermenter Doctor g. When building up pressure in a fermenter, it burst. However, the effects were the same as an explosion. He was a mystery how this accident could have happened. Biogas plants are "basically not dangerous g. Baumann claims to have" looked after well over 100 g of biogas plants during the critical start-up and would like to express not yet on the possible cause of the accident. It had the report of the expert to be expected. It should be clarified whether and how a spark - it needed a spark of over 700 degrees C - for example by aufeinanderreibende metal parts or a torn cable may have been incurred.

The damage of the explosion, which was no explosion, is estimated at 1.5 to 2 million €. Close to the sign "Energy Farm - Here is the biogas plant of Riedlingen GmbH & Co. KG g intact RECOURSE, it has received only a few brown spots. The Energy Farm operators there is grandfathering, ie, they must build the plant in the approved scope again. For this case there is some good advice from Austria: In order to minimize the risk of such accidents, Franz Kirchmeyr ARGE Compost & Biogas from Austria recommends the fermenter prior to first boot with a non-explosive Inert gas fill.

as an expert, Dipl.-Ing. Wolfgang H. Stachowitz - publicly appointed and sworn expert for biogas plants etc. - ordered. He writes on his website:
"We were on 27 and 28 December 2007, place, and convinced us of the damage pattern and the possible causes such damages. Signs of an explosion and / or prolonged (> sec - range) "fire / smoke, we have not been determined. It is our opinion there are many similarities to the damage of the ZD Deiderode MBA from January 2005, where we were also involved as the cause Sachverstänige determination. After consultation with the competent CID Biberach and the LKA will be published in January, then probably an official report on the causes, timing and consequences. g
Stachowitz added later:
"We want to inform you in this way that the" rumors g to an explosion caused the injury / accident on the BGA Riedlingen before Christmas 2007 are not based on the encountered reality.
As mandated experts - Office could convince us of the spot of the cause and the effect of the criminal police and the LKA and other SVs.
The current investigation may we currently only say that there are many similarities to the MBA damage are on the ZD Deiderode the as-nds in Göttingen. There we were one of the designated SV - Offices for damage assessment. g

Our opinion: That was fast but this time, Mr. Stachowitz. To find out that the MBA Deiderode did not explode, you have at least taken nearly two years without identifying the cause of accident eventually (as reported in November 2007). It urges upon us the suspicion that you provide in the service of insurance is not all that you have found your obvious expertise available. Sworn or not, is, there is between a loss adjuster (Insurance), the injured person (owner / operator) and the Anlagenerrrichter always a conflict of interest in case of accident. During our research, we always come back to the detachment of an explosion. We ask: Should the insurance not pay if there was no explosion and no fire? "Explosion g" g deflagration or not, we make the following consideration: How likely is it that an eyewitness was mistaken in Riedlingen deep black night with a fireball? Did she hallucinating? Otherwise, we trust but just the reports of firefighters Riedlingen and Biberach. Then it was a "serious explosion g.

The report of the police and the prosecutor Biberach Ravensburg of 9 January 2008 was clearly in the statement, but only partially helpful. The officials have determined that sabotage / a crime must be excluded as a cause of injury. They want to examine documents in the coming weeks on the sinking in Deiderode.

Interestingly, we find the report of the daily paper of 20 Mühlacker December 2007 during the commissioning of the biogas plant Mühlacker near Pforzheim. The Journal writes:
was "at yesterday's meeting in the biomethane plant accident in the Riedlingen - the MT reported in detail - also talk about. In the meantime, was the cause of the accident is known, said yesterday in the woods fields. Consequently, there were in the fermenter a vacuum and as a result, an implosion. g

The source of this knowledge is not mentioned. However, this scenario seems plausible: by a leak or an open drain valve incorrectly escapes fermentation substrate from the fermenter. In the gas chamber creates a vacuum that sucks the roof to bursting inside. The collapse of a spark caused by a broken power line or by another striking steel parts. A sub-variant of this scenario would be that the roof does not yield at first, but only becomes leaky and outdoor air is drawn into the fermentation chamber. Upon reaching an explosive gas mixture would have to be a thermal or electrical Source of ignition have been involved. That would then have two failures and statistically less likely unless they are causally related. We are focused on whether the expert is Stachowitz have explored in two years. By the way: According to rough calculation, the surface load on the bottom plate was about 20 t / m2. Meanwhile

comes on when residents of other biogas plants unrest, so in small Sachsenheim north of Stuttgart. A neighbor of the biogas plant, which has followed the news about the disaster in Riedlingen said, in December 2007, the Stuttgarter Zeitung: "We live here in the middle of the kill zone." His house is located 40 meters according to their own statement of the European Academy of Saxony.

How fear of death feels like, has experienced a security guard for the MBA accident in Göttingen-Deiderode. The county fire association Göttingen wrote on 21 January 2006 at his website:
"misfortune in Deiderode: high Damage (21.01.2006)
are on Saturday morning to 5.40 clock on the grounds of the high waste disposal association in Lower Saxony Deiderode two approximately 20-meter fermentation vessels (called fermentation) shattered . A fermenter is a bioreactor in which specially bred microorganisms or cells under the most optimal conditions are cultivated in a nutrient medium to either the cells themselves, parts of them or one of its metabolites to win (source: wikipedia.de ).
A security guard of a foreign company was sitting in the wax container about 30 yards away from the fermenters when he heard a loud noise. He looked out the window and 4.5 million liters of fermentation sludge and 2.5 million liters of rain water shot up to him - like an avalanche. "I just kept still on the door frame," the guard said. Miraculously, he is not injured. A neighbor container is carried along. Also the car is dragged several meters by the floods. The sinking pool could trap the masses only in part.
residents from Deiderode other hand report of a loud bang. What was the exact cause of the rupture of the digester, is still unknown. Even in 150 meters thick lying rocks, probably of walls. g

The Swabian newspaper is not impressed by the lean of news reports and not dig up the MBA crashed through in Göttingen. On 31 December 2007, the newspaper writes:
"Yes, we came to the residence of Deiderode on the night of 21 January 2006 at an accident," said Mark Rybarczyk, deputy manager of the waste disposal association southern Lower Saxony. "A fermenter wrecked shortly after commissioning. Two other enzymes and other parts of the bio-mechanical waste treatment plant had to have been destroyed. The damage lies approximately ten Million €.
"However, there was no explosion at us," said Rybak. Possible factors he could not open because of a procedure and a settlement agreement with a mechanical engineering company based in Bremen, which had designed the system, say nothing. "Just this: It does not have the background and not located on the process technology," said the Deputy Leader. But as far as he was informed there had been in the fermenter in a Deiderode identical fermenter in Daugendorf: enameled steel panels, bolted double row. Questions about static he could not answer from the previously mentioned reasons but also so Rybarczyk. "However, I would like to refer that to rebuild our plant another subcontractor was responsible. The new digester is now a fully welded steel tank. "
" Our tank was pressure tested, "the statement by Günther Fuchshuber is to Daugendorf fermenter. The engineer is the director of the Austrian company GLS tanks, the manufacturer of the crashed fermenter in Daugendorf. A company that was until 2006 under the name Wolf Email GmbH to the Austrian Wolf System Group. According to Mark Rybarczyk Wolf Email built as a subcontractor to the fermenter in Deiderode. Guenther Fuchs Huber was up for sale by Wolf email there as manager.
" The sale added by Wolf email not to do with Deiderode "said Franz Reidlbacher, Managing Director Austria Wolf system. There would have been much earlier intention to sell. It was a purely strategic decision.
base plate exposed
" Sure, there are at first appear a few matches between Deiderode and the system at Riedlingen. so Fuchshuber Both plants were finally been in a critical phase of operations, but when asked who had taken off in the fermenter in Daugendorf the statics, is his comment. "I have the name the judicial police reported. Next I will say nothing. "And refers to other Components, which in his opinion identical should have been in Deiderode and Daugendorf.
Even the detectives on the ground wanted to comment on Friday not to question the structural analysis. At the accident site, the concrete floor slab, the foundation of the fermenter, with the help of volunteers exposed firefighters Riedlingen and examined by experts from the police. g

There is bolted and welded steel tanks for fermentation. not mentioned in this context, concrete tanks, as they are built into the MBA Hannover. The IGW Witzenhausen engineering community has the latter and enamel-steel tanks on its website documented (see links below).

The IGW Witzenhausen and the Institute have in the past year a special topic the biogas investigated: Is it worth the fermentation of organic waste? In July 2007 the two institutions, the "Economic evaluation of composting systems with regard to the integration of an anaerobic stage g as Vorschaltanlage have published.

On page 26, the experts draw the following conclusion:

"As the observations show the integration of a digestion step as Vorschaltanlage in composting plants has become much more interesting. Depending on the technology and use concept on the basis of the EEG can be achieved per tonne of organic waste, including possible bonuses revenues of 20 € to 35 €. The proceeds are, however, additional investment or Set operating costs compared with that in general not sufficient for an efficient, compared to composting exclusive, cost-neutral operation g.

hot, are usually on it must be paid for the additional fermentation of organic waste. Most of the digestion plants in Germany is concerned not because they are charged with this grown, renewable raw materials (energy crops). Here, the calculation looks different. According to the Biogas Association, there were as at 15th January 2008 over 3700 installed biogas plants in Germany. This organization shall notify the occasion with its annual meeting. The total number of differentiated but not since the digestate (energy crops, Biowaste, MBA / household waste).


Sources:

http://www.suedwest-aktiv.de/region/albbote/rundschau_von_der_alb/3291932/artikel.php?SWAID=fce116c24dc4f2ba8d9fe0c512a92f23
http://www.szon.de/news/ wirimsueden/land/200712180999.html? _from http://www.szon.de/lokales/riedlingen = rss

http://www.szon.de/lokales/riedlingen/riedlingen/200712180484.html
/ riedlingen/200712180484.html? apage = 1 & SZONSID = 7b4a8c7f2679e43c69606d6af122d15c
http://www.bauernzeitung.at/?id=2500% 2C27849% 2C% 2C http://www.feuerwehr-riedlingen
. de /
http://www.feuerwehr-biberach.de/

http://www.fermenterdoktor.de/

http://www.kompost-biogas.info/

http://www.das-ib.de/sachverst.htm

http://www.polizei-biberach.de/servlet/PB/menu/1248678/index.html?ROOT=1123013

http://www.muehlacker.de/mt/artikel.php?p=2007/12/20/1/

http://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/stz/page/detail.php/1593926

http://www.kfv-goe.de/

http://www.szon.de/lokales/riedlingen/riedlingen/200712310433.html

http://www.igw-witzenhausen.de/referenzsuche_detail.php?ID=42

http://www.igw-witzenhausen.de/referenzsuche_detail.php?ID=28

http://www.igw-witzenhausen.de/downloads.html

http://www.biogastagung.org/de/press/ars12/ars25/?arspageid=25.pm.4073


Here still an unscientific approach to Riedlinger accident. What form does
Kuhkacke at best when they can freely chosen?

supported by gravity, of course, the shape of a pancake! Sometimes he gets a little bigger.



More news in brief:

from the insolvency of MBA-plant manufacturer Horstmann 1,000 items were auctioned. According to the receiver rack is in the "small stuff g.
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:w4EZ1DtPtSoJ:www.vlothoer-anzeiger.de/va/lokales/bad_oeynhausen/% 3fsid% 3D6e7bcfdd8f720e649c28d288c30bf5fe% 26cnt% 3D2008673 + horstmann + auction + Hammer & hl = en & ct = clnk & cd = 2 & gl = de &

http://www.vlothoer-anzeiger.de/va/lokales/bad_oeynhausen/?cnt=2014488


T-Plus sends garbage, which closed the book and MBA Heilbronn now can not hold more, on trips: Leuna MVA, MVA Dusseldorf, Mannheim MVA, MVA Stuttgart:
http://www.ludwigsburger-kreiszeitung.de/index/LKZPortal/Lokalnachrichten.html?arid=5634

Up to 10,000 t Luebeck MBT-waste is placed for 1.5 million € to Salzgitter. 500,000 euros of which wants to bring back the city of Luebeck MBT plant Bauer Haase.
http://www.ln-online.de/lokales/2263331
http://www.newsclick.de/index.jsp/menuid/2163/artid/7641837

The MBA Linkenbach at Neuwied stinks Since March 2007, the residents say:
http://www.recyclingmagazin.de/rm/news_detail.asp?ID=8366&SID=5554246624970200&NS=1

Lahn-Dill-Kreis, the MBA will not have given Aßlar:
http://www.lahn-dill-kreis.de/presse/ldk_presse_artikel_57237.html wishes


A good year 2008, you
Henriette Franke
for author's collective waste management criticism



Saturday, November 17, 2007

Disgaea Afternoon Of Darkness Oficial Guide

Abfallbehandl. in Lübeck, Göttingen, Ennigerloh

MBA Lübeck: dirty linen in public
MBA New York: Almost two years unexplained
MBA Ennigerloh: Regular attendance of the fire

Engineering company Haase Energietechnik Lübeck, and disposal operations (EBL) have for their argument about the MBA at the landfill Lübeck Niemark selected the maximum visibility for the Worl Wide Web. Thus, for the world read that the ratio of the two parties is thoroughly ruined. Here are the continuing chronicle of a disaster (as reported on 2 August 2007).

The system is in trial operation since May 2006. Lübeck media reported in August 2007 that some damage had been fixed and other repairs still ran. Haase had been advertised in the meantime to take over the waste division of the EBL and the operation of the MBA. The Lübeck Senator environmental Thorsten Geissler noted a stalemate. The requirement of Haase for more service personnel on the part of the EBL was rejected by the Attorney. EBL acknowledged, however, that in early August short-term staffing problems have been what was reprimanded by Haase promptly. The Lübeck CDU-waste expert Rüdiger Hinrichs described the atmosphere between Haase and EBL to be clearly very bad. He came before him like a bad movie.
http://www.hl-live.de/aktuell/textstart.php?id=35754
http://www.hl-live.de/aktuell/text.php?id=35754
http://www.hl-live.de/aktuell/text.php?id=35817
http://www.ln-online.de/lokales/2211080

in September 2007 the conflict escalated. According to the news Lübeck accused Haase of the EBL, rack and ruin they leave the facility and the undermanned staff was listless. The newspaper reported on 1.9.2007:
"Everywhere is mud. In the conveyor belts to collect the garbage. include container, the remains of swell about. Every few meters are puddles on the concrete floor. depend on machines and treadmills bits of plastic. The mechanical-biological waste treatment plant (MBT) at the landfill Niemark collected, sorted and recovered the prosperity of the mud in Lübeck. In less than two years of operation, it looks like a dustbin. If Rolf Sieksmeyer and Dr. Jörg Kliefoth from the construction company from Neumünster by Haase go 32 million-euro plant, grabs a cold rage. "We're worried about the plant," said attorney and manager. "Wants

The EBL not make the investment because it does not create full load. Haase counters, except for full load too little waste there. This year will be dead . Elsewhere, we have no such problems. This refers to orders in the UK and Malta.
http://www.ln-online.de/lokales/2211716
(also see source below)

The Lübeck do the allegations of Haase can not sit up. On 3 September 2007, the EBL was in a press release outraged and angry. point by point, a detailed reply given. Haase also obviously trying to exploit the public.
http://www.luebeck.de/aktuelles/presse/pressedienstarchiv/view/2007/9/070654R/
http://www.entsorgung.luebeck.de/aktuelles/pressemeldungen/neu_110.html
(also see source below)

On 28 September 2007 reported the Lübeck Internet portal HL-live:
"MBA: progress in repair work
make the repairs to the mechanical-biological waste treatment plant (MBT) progress. As the technical director of waste companies Lübeck, Manfred Wicke, on Thursday afternoon at the Works Committee told, can now "biology" be re-booted. Requirement for this repair work was on the dryer and the agitator, who could now be concluded. The commissioning of the cooling is still before 15 October place.
http://www.hl-live.de/aktuell/text.php?id=36672

On 9 November 2007, Haase terminated the contract for services with EBL on the establishment of the MBA Lübeck. Justification in Haase press release: Personal and organizational deficits in urban side, the system of functional decline and lack of a technical (EBL), head of the plant.
http://www.haase-energietechnik.de/de/News/
(see source below)
The reproach in terms of technical Head can not be dismissed out of hand. Andreas Seeger had quit in July 2007 (as reported on 2 August 2007). Lübeck Mayor Bernd Saxe

counters but the staff argument. "This is a specious argument that he told the news Lübeck. Environment Senator Geissler maintains the dismissal is not justified and will require Haase for all costs of damages. Günter Wosnitza of the Lübeck Green complains that the plant engineers a "transparent maneuver" before. The two year, unexplained breakdown series serves to "take over the plant." Haase has the back as a bad assumption.
http://www.ln-online.de/lokales/2252746
http://www.ln-online.de/lokales/2253741
(see source below)

Our views:
The lawyers of both parties, the winners will be. Both parties turn out to be related to the dispute led a disservice. The EBL will be difficult for the exhibited dirty laundry to find a buyer, and the current and future customers Haase could take the shock in the limbs. In addition, a lack of clarification of responsibilities is very poorly maintained plant accident risk.

How expensive can be a MBA accident and how long drag on the cause of research can, spoke in early October 2007 Wolfgang H. Stachowitz from the IB GmbH (Kiel) at the 11th Waste and Landfill Symposium Sardinia. Gothaer insurance had him appointed to investigate the total loss of MBA southern Lower Saxony (Göttingen Deiderode). The accident happened on 21 January 2006, the damage amounts to about 10 million €, an explosion is excluded and the investigation is not completed until today, that we do not know any details. Stachowitz emphasizes the protection of evidence went very slowly, causing additional costs would arise for all involved. The presentation can be downloaded here:
http://www.das-ib.de/vortraege.htm


The MBA critical Spiegel article . Waste scandal - Deo from fog cannons "of 3 August 2007
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0, 1518,497823,00 html
has now waste expert Klaus Stief comments:
" How so often with mirror items - if one knows anything about it -. a mess of the core is not incorrect facts, but which is considered in the context of the contribution of me as pure polemic The worst thing is that not clear what the author really wants .: It is against the MBA, compared to waste incineration, landfill against the
But you should read the amount of calm and remember - in the event that one is even trying another post, the one really likes to believe.
http://www.deponie-stief.de/mba/maktuell.htm

Here is an addendum to the major fire on the alternative fuel processing plant in the MBA Ennigerloh (from Ecowest) on 3 February 2007. The comrades from the volunteer fire department city Ennigerloh know the way to the disposal center on the west side probably blindfolded. Since the fire, they were summoned there 11 times for false alarms (February 8, March 5, March 7, May 9, June 1, June 12, June 19, June 19, July 15, 28 July, 13 September). For more than two months is quiet. You should check the fire alarm time, ie whether they are still there or whether they are off someone added. It might come really burn ...
http://www.feuerwehr-ennigerloh.de/Einsaetze/Einsaetze2007/einsaetze2007.htm

friendly greetings from
Henriette Franke for waste management criticism of authors



Sources: Report of the Lübeck
news on 1 September 2007
"The expensive MBA threatens to rack and ruin
Lübeck - the row over the MBA, the fronts harden completely. The lawyers call the shots. A compromise is in sight. This affects the system. Besuch.Überall is a mess. In the conveyor belts to collect the garbage. include container, the remains of swell about. Every few meters are puddles on the concrete floor. depend on machines and treadmills bits of plastic. The mechanical-biological waste treatment plant (MBT) at the landfill Niemark collected, sorted and recovered the prosperity of the mud in Lübeck. In less than two years of operation, it looks like a dustbin. If going Rolf Sieksmeyer and Dr. Jörg Kliefoth from the construction company Haase from Neumünster by the 32 million-euro plant, grabs a cold rage. "We're worried about the plant," said attorney and manager. The waste disposal companies (EBL) would not provide enough staff to control the highly complex MBA reasonable. "We need 17 staff in a layer, set off the Haase-people before, "if 14 there were, it would be nice." Meticulously have listed both the number of posts in recent months. Between eleven and 14 percent the amount of absenteeism. Kliefoth: "And this despite already missing four men per shift." But not enough, it's provided by the waste disposal service personnel listless, criticized the company Haase. Who would work here, hear, taste, smell, "describes the ideal MBA Sieksmeyer man. And moreover,'s take a broom in his hand. The owner of Neumünster is sent to the waste disposal service for the Personalnot a warning. The lawyer for the EBL has rejected the criticism. He could not understand the information. While Haase Personalnot denounces annoy, the EBL and politician of constant technical problems. there were always surprises, laments the EBL-tip. Currently, a combustion chamber and cooling repairs for wet digestion can be installed. There were problems with the sand trap with the transmissions of the agitators. "A garbage plant is subject to considerable wear," said Sieksmeyer. This is due above all to the many sand in Lübeck's waste, the rub on the steel parts such as sand paper. The two parties have fallen out over the years completely. "The discussion thread is broken," laments Sieksmeyer attorney, "I do not think so quickly to an agreement." The problem: The EBL will not make the investment. Reason: The MBA while creating the legally prescribed values, but not under full load. How, then, counters Haase. The city put far too much garbage disposal - 610 a week instead of 1635 tons. If one gets garbage from outside, one must convert the MBA for 320 000 euros, says Haase. This is not to the EBL-tip. "We need to find a solution," says Senator environmental Thorsten Geissler (CDU). Especially as the EBL have paid the price this set. This year will be dead, prophesied Sieksmeyer attorney. Elsewhere, we have no such problems. Haase is building the plant in Lübeck England and Malta.
From Kai Dordowsky, LN


press release the city of Lübeck and the EBL of 3 September 2007
"treatment facilities have allegations back to the MBA
Entsorgungsbetriebe Lübeck reject the allegations of the company for Haase Mechanical-biological waste treatment plant with determination.
has reacted with surprise extreme, the plant management of waste companies to Lübeck by Haase public allegations related to the mechanical-biological waste treatment plant (MBT Lübeck). "We reject the allegations raised by the company Haase back with determination. They have stirred up anger and indignation of the workforce, said the commercial director of waste companies Lübeck, Dr. Jan-Dirk Verwey, and technical director, Manfred Wicke.
explain in detail the management of enterprises: first
Again awakened by the Haase in the public the impression that the technical problems in the construction of the plant were due to the fact that the treatment facilities shall not enough staff "to control the highly complex MBA reasonable. In this context, the company said Haase, there would need 17 employees in one shift. The fact is that the treatment facilities either by the agreement between the company Haase and disposal service contract or by any other additional agreement required employees to call in this number. The company should be the Haase believes that, over the contracted number of additional staff, the costs may be this is not the Lübeck fee payers will be charged. The company Haase trying to divert attention from the fact that they do not to this day is able to provide the disposal service contractually owed functional mechanical-biological waste treatment plant.
second The action brought by Haase claim that the waste disposal service provided by the staff "listless, has caused outrage in the workforce. The Staff has not submitted a separate opinion. The fact is that the staff of treatment facilities under difficult conditions to provide a constantly troubled with technical facility dedicated work.
third Absurd is the accusation of Haase, the treatment facilities would provide too little garbage disposal. First, the treatment facilities are only required during the performance run when the system is thus completed so far that it reaches all contract values and the acceptability is to be found - an amount worth 330 t of household waste to be used daily. Second, the treatment facilities therefore have less waste transported to the plant because the plant by permanent defects and partial failures including the moment is far from being able to handle more waste.
4th It is wrong to claim the company Haase, the waste plant is subject to considerable wear because of the Lübeck waste contains a lot of sand on average. The quality of the Lübeck waste is no different from that of the surrounding communities and meets the basic contractual data. The truth is, however, that the system does not process the garbage contract. However, this is a problem of the system, not a problem of waste composition.
5th Resolutely connect to treatment facilities, contrary to the impression conveyed by Haase, MBA threatened due to lack of cleaning work to rack and ruin. " The company provides Haase to the erroneous impression that extensive cleaning of the machines can also be performed during operation of the plant in compliance with safety regulations. This is not the case. It is true that the plant is next to the daily cleaning routine maintenance at specified intervals by the staff of treatment facilities regularly cleaned and fully serviced.
6th Wrong is the assertion of the company Haase, she had "elsewhere ... such problems. One is by Haase in Brandenburg built complex not removed also to this day. The facilities in England and Malta are still far from completion.
Haase apparently tried to exploit the public because it is not in a position to meet its contractual obligations. The plant management, the company calls the EBL Haase yet to return to the negotiating table.
explains this environment senator Thorsten Geissler concludes:
"We remind the company Haase strongly due to their contractual obligations. Rather than to take the public unjustified accusations, should the company Haase focus on solving their technical problems to ensure that the installation can be taken to for acceptance. The treatment facilities have signaled willingness to cooperate again. "


press release by Haase-energy technology on 12 November 2007:
"HAASE Anlagenbau MBA announces contract for services with the disposal company Lübeck (EBL)
On Friday 9 November, the plant HAASE, Neumünster, the work contract with EBL on the establishment of the MBA Lübeck terminated. This step was necessary after the collaboration with the EBL due to human and organizational deficits at city page can not be called effective.
Since a half years in the MBA Lübeck Lübeck treated the entire waste and disposed of. Here are the requirements of the Waste Disposal Ordinance observed. Nevertheless, it has not come today to a technical inspection of the plant by EBL. The human and organizational shortcomings on the part of the EBL for the operation of the plant, the plant was cited by Haase lead increasingly to a functional deterioration of the system. EBL does not have a technical plant manager, who serves as executive partner for HAASE Anlagenbau available to correct the problems together.
The technical state of the system deteriorated from month to month. These circumstances are to be answered by EBL and are beyond the control of plant HAASE.
HAASE Anlagenbau EBL has offered mid-September, the operation of the MBA Lübeck in a take over on 1 year fixed-term transfer agreement, to EBL to be relieved of operational responsibility and the technical and commercial system to operate optimally. The offer implies that the consideration of the management by HAASE Anlagenbau moved in the height of the current operating costs. Economic improvements are to be paid 50/50 by the parties. An agreement could not be completed until today. HAASE Anlagenbau is still willing to talk, to reach a constructive solution.


report of Lübeck on 13 News November 2007
"MBA: City threatens Company for damages from Lübeck (LN) - The city and the treatment facilities do not accept the termination of their MBA Partners. The CDU calls for a hurried environment Sondersitzung.Gestern morning Senator Thorsten Geissler (CDU) even for highly mechanical-biological waste treatment plant (MBT) at the landfill Niemark. Geissler wanted to get an idea on the spot: Is the operation in spite of the escalating dispute between the contractors and the disposal company (EBL)? On Friday, the contractors, the company Haase from Neumünster, working with EBL and the city had terminated unexpectedly. "The collaboration with the EBL is due to human and organizational failures, as no more purposeful be called "the Haase's executive offices, said yesterday. These deficits were" becoming a functional decline of the plant "lead." technical condition of the plant deteriorated from month to month, "said Haase. Environment Senator Geissler does not recognize this as grounds for dismissal . We termination consider unjustified and against Haase for all costs damages claim, "the head of department. EBL and city would be now write with Haase a status report for the MBA and study the system of external reviewers. determine the evaluators should if more money is needed to bring the high-tech garbage plant a reliable running. A garbage emergency not threatened, however, assure both sides. Since one and a half years of Lübeck prosperity dirt is pushed through the MBA and then buried in the landfill. While Haase says the MBA met all legal requirements, city and EBL will deny this, the waste not processed according to contract, there is always accidents, argues Lübeck. Therefore, the EBL system have not yet taken off. The politicians are reflected clearly on the side of the administration. "Haase is not suitable as a partner," criticizes Rüdiger Hinrichs, disposal expert of the CDU, "Lübeck has fulfilled all obligations." The arguments of the Neumünsteraner that the EBL have provided too few staff, were a pretext, Henri Abler (SPD), is Chairman of the Works Committee, says: "The MBA reaches a part of the allocated values is not easy." Günter Wosnitza (Green) takes issue with the plant engineers a "transparent maneuver" before. The two year, unexplained breakdown series serves to "take over the plant," explains Wosnitza: "I do not see that Lübeck has made mistakes." Haase spokeswoman Ursula packing houses reject the accusation of "transparent maneuver" as a bad assumption. The truth is, however, that Haase has offered the EBL in mid-September to take over temporarily the operation of the MBA for a year. Today discussed the Main Committee, as with The MBA continues. The CDU calls for a special meeting of the working committee. The position of the city and the EBL in this case is not so cheap: Because most of the 26-million contract has already been paid. 95 percent are referred to Haase. Kai Dordowsky, LN "